Ravikumar s/o Bhirappa, 35 yrs, R/o Konkanhalli, Tq. Sedam vs Maruti s/o Jemsingh Rathod, 28 yrs, R/o Plot No. 11, Mahalaxmi, Tilak Nagar, Kusnoor road, Kalabura — 392/2024

Case under 166 Imv Act Section 166. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evidence-CIVIL Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB710016882024

Filing Number

231/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

392/2024

Registration Date

05-Apr-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

166 Imv Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravikumar s/o Bhirappa, 35 yrs, R/o Konkanhalli, Tq. Sedam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maruti s/o Jemsingh Rathod, 28 yrs, R/o Plot No. 11, Mahalaxmi, Tilak Nagar, Kusnoor road, Kalabura

  2. 2.The Manager, Cholamandalam MS Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd., Block No. VIII, Near SVP chowk, Asian Plaza comple

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC No. 392/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves a motor vehicle accident where petitioner Ravikumar, a passenger on motorcycle KA 32 EA 0707, was injured when another motorcycle collided with his vehicle. The court examined PW-1 (petitioner's) testimony on 25-02-2026 regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000 claimed), lost income (₹25,000/month), and disability claims. The judgment found inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony and evidence, noting fabricated medical bills and contradictory statements about the accident circumstances and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    IssueView PDF

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  10. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  11. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  15. 07-May-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  20. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  21. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  22. 09-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  23. 03-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  26. 10-Jul-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  27. 20-May-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  28. 10-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 392/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC No. 392/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves a motor vehicle accident where petitioner Ravikumar, a passenger on motorcycle KA 32 EA 0707, was injured when another motorcycle collided with his vehicle. The court examined PW-1 (petitioner's) testimony on 25-02-2026 regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000 claimed), lost income (₹25,000/month), and disability claims. The judgment found inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony and evidence, noting fabricated medical bills and contradictory statements about the accident circumstances and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case