Ravikumar s/o Bhirappa, 35 yrs, R/o Konkanhalli, Tq. Sedam vs Maruti s/o Jemsingh Rathod, 28 yrs, R/o Plot No. 11, Mahalaxmi, Tilak Nagar, Kusnoor road, Kalabura — 392/2024

Case under 166 Imv Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB710016882024

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

231/2024

Filing Date

15-02-2024

Registration No

392/2024

Registration Date

05-04-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

Acts & Sections

166 Imv Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Ravikumar s/o Bhirappa, 35 yrs, R/o Konkanhalli, Tq. Sedam

Respondent(s)

Maruti s/o Jemsingh Rathod, 28 yrs, R/o Plot No. 11, Mahalaxmi, Tilak Nagar, Kusnoor road, Kalabura

The Manager, Cholamandalam MS Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd., Block No. VIII, Near SVP chowk, Asian Plaza comple

Hearing History

Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

13-05-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

20-12-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

21-08-2024
Orders
05-02-2025
Deposition
20-12-2025
Issue
25-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: MVC No. 392/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves a motor vehicle accident where petitioner Ravikumar, a passenger on motorcycle KA 32 EA 0707, was injured when another motorcycle collided with his vehicle. The court examined PW-1 (petitioner's) testimony on 25-02-2026 regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000 claimed), lost income (₹25,000/month), and disability claims. The judgment found inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony and evidence, noting fabricated medical bills and contradictory statements about the accident circumstances and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC No. 392/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves a motor vehicle accident where petitioner Ravikumar, a passenger on motorcycle KA 32 EA 0707, was injured when another motorcycle collided with his vehicle. The court examined PW-1 (petitioner's) testimony on 25-02-2026 regarding medical expenses (₹3,50,000 claimed), lost income (₹25,000/month), and disability claims. The judgment found inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony and evidence, noting fabricated medical bills and contradictory statements about the accident circumstances and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case