Nagamma w/o Bhimaraya Vaderaj, 41 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam, now c/o Lokesh, H. No. 16/17, vs Sabanna s/o Bhimraya Borra Waddar, 45 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam. — 19/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710012942024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
19/2024
Filing Date
08-02-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
08-02-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagamma w/o Bhimaraya Vaderaj, 41 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam, now c/o Lokesh, H. No. 16/17,
Adv. SRI. RAVINDRA INJALIKAR ADVOCATE
Respondent(s)
Sabanna s/o Bhimraya Borra Waddar, 45 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam.
Yellappa s/o Sabanna Myakal, 70 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam.
Chandramma w/o Yellappa, 60 yrs, R/o Namwar, Tq. Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 19/2024, the court examined testimony from PW-1 (first witness) regarding a land dispute case. The witness testified about land ownership claims and a monetary settlement of 2 lakh rupees. The court found the witness's testimony inconsistent and unreliable on key issues, including claims of no relationship to the disputed land and denial of the defendants' ownership rights established since 1975. Cross-examination is continuing, with the case scheduled for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 19/2024, the court examined testimony from PW-1 (first witness) regarding a land dispute case. The witness testified about land ownership claims and a monetary settlement of 2 lakh rupees. The court found the witness's testimony inconsistent and unreliable on key issues, including claims of no relationship to the disputed land and denial of the defendants' ownership rights established since 1975. Cross-examination is continuing, with the case scheduled for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts