Sharanappa @ Sharanayya s/o Narasayya, 55 yrs, R/o Nachawar, Tq. Sedam. vs Shivakantamma w/o Narasappa Yargol, 60 yrs, R/o Hulagola, Tq. Sedam, — 16/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB710012612024

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2024

Filing Number

16/2024

Filing Date

03-02-2024

Registration No

16/2024

Registration Date

03-02-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

Acts & Sections

U/O 7 RULE 1 OF CPC Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Sharanappa @ Sharanayya s/o Narasayya, 55 yrs, R/o Nachawar, Tq. Sedam.

Adv. Revanasiddappa shivappa

Respondent(s)

Shivakantamma w/o Narasappa Yargol, 60 yrs, R/o Hulagola, Tq. Sedam,

Hearing History

Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

06-04-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

01-04-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

26-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

18-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

16-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CIVIL

Interim Orders

09-08-2024
Deposition
27-11-2024
Orders
27-11-2024
Issue
28-01-2025
Deposition
06-03-2025
Deposition
17-03-2025
Deposition
27-06-2025
Deposition
21-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In OS No. 16/2024, the court examined a property dispute (Survey No. 47) involving the plaintiff's claims regarding inherited land. The witness testimony revealed inconsistencies in the plaintiff's account, and critical documents (purchase deed and property transfer records) were not produced before the court. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish legal ownership or rights over the disputed property and rejected the plaintiff's claims as unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 16/2024, the court examined a property dispute (Survey No. 47) involving the plaintiff's claims regarding inherited land. The witness testimony revealed inconsistencies in the plaintiff's account, and critical documents (purchase deed and property transfer records) were not produced before the court. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish legal ownership or rights over the disputed property and rejected the plaintiff's claims as unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case