State through Mudhol PS vs Raju @ Rajesh son of Pandyanayak Rathod Age 35 years Occ Pvt work resi of Jakanpalli tanda Advocate - Parshuram Reddy — 589/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34132324504. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB710012342024
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
589/2024
Filing Date
05-08-2021
Registration No
589/2024
Registration Date
05-08-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Mudhol PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Raju @ Rajesh son of Pandyanayak Rathod Age 35 years Occ Pvt work resi of Jakanpalli tanda Advocate - Parshuram Reddy
Ravi son of Pandyanayak Rathod Age 30 years Occ Pvt work resi of Jakanpalli tanda
Pandyanayak son of Somlyanayak Rathod Age 60 years Occ Coolie resi of Jakanpalli tanda
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: CC No. 589-2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMF Court, Sedam The case involves a criminal complaint dated 21-05-2021 regarding an alleged assault. The witness (Tarabai, complainant) testified that the accused attacked her husband with a stick, causing injuries to his head and shoulder. During cross-examination, the defense challenged her credibility, alleging she gave false testimony. The court found the witness testimony to be partially adverse and permitted cross-examination. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with no final judgment delivered on this date (18-09-2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: CC No. 589-2024 | Senior Civil Judge & JMF Court, Sedam The case involves a criminal complaint dated 21-05-2021 regarding an alleged assault. The witness (Tarabai, complainant) testified that the accused attacked her husband with a stick, causing injuries to his head and shoulder. During cross-examination, the defense challenged her credibility, alleging she gave false testimony. The court found the witness testimony to be partially adverse and permitted cross-examination. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with no final judgment delivered on this date (18-09-2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts