Laxmi w/o Hanamappa d/o Sayappa, 32 yrs, R/o Rudrawar, Post. Chitakanpalli, Tq. Sedam. vs Hanamappa s/o Bhojappa, 38 yrs, R/o Duganoor, Tq. Sedam. — 8/2024
Case under 13 1 I a and 13 1 I of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
M.C. - MATRIMONIAL CASES
CNR: KAKB710010482024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi w/o Hanamappa d/o Sayappa, 32 yrs, R/o Rudrawar, Post. Chitakanpalli, Tq. Sedam.
Adv. DESHPANDE PRAKASH UPENDRA
Respondent(s)
Hanamappa s/o Bhojappa, 38 yrs, R/o Duganoor, Tq. Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: MC No. 8/2024 Outcome: The witness (PW-1) testimony was recorded on 21-02-2026 in this matrimonial dispute. The witness, represented by advocate VJM, testified regarding a 20-year-old marriage, stating that the husband had lived with her family for 8-9 years before being asked to leave after she secured employment as an Anganwadi worker in 2011. The witness denied making false accusations and allegations against her husband. No cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded with recording the witness statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: MC No. 8/2024 Outcome: The witness (PW-1) testimony was recorded on 21-02-2026 in this matrimonial dispute. The witness, represented by advocate VJM, testified regarding a 20-year-old marriage, stating that the husband had lived with her family for 8-9 years before being asked to leave after she secured employment as an Anganwadi worker in 2011. The witness denied making false accusations and allegations against her husband. No cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded with recording the witness statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts