Avinash vs Pawar Priyanka — 10/2025

Case under Order 9 Rule 7 Cpc Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAKB710009652025

e-Filing Number

06-12-2025

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

06-Dec-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 9 Rule 7 Cpc Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Avinash

    Adv. Narayana NK Yanagundi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawar Priyanka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Sedam allowed the petitioner's application under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC to restore divorce petition MC No.12/2024, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's medical certificate showing he suffered from viral fever and could not appear for evidence, and the respondent raised no objection. The petition was restored to its original position with both parties directed to appear on 28.03.2026 for the petitioner to give evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  6. 24-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Sedam allowed the petitioner's application under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC to restore divorce petition MC No.12/2024, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's medical certificate showing he suffered from viral fever and could not appear for evidence, and the respondent raised no objection. The petition was restored to its original position with both parties directed to appear on 28.03.2026 for the petitioner to give evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case