Gunja shreyani Raju vs All concerned — 11/2025
Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
G and W.C. - Guardian and Wards Cases
CNR: KAKB710008772025
e-Filing Number
09-10-2025
Filing Number
1/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gunja shreyani Raju
Adv. MALLANAGOWDA S
Respondent(s)
All concerned
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam allowed the petition filed by a minor's mother under Sections 27 & 28 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, granting permission to sell 4 acres 22 guntas of agricultural land in Kalaburagi district registered in the minor's name. The court found the sale justified as the property is located over 200 km away from the family's residence in Hyderabad, making agricultural activity impractical, and authorized the mother to reinvest the sale proceeds in purchasing property for the minor in Hyderabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Sedam allowed the petition filed by a minor's mother under Sections 27 & 28 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, granting permission to sell 4 acres 22 guntas of agricultural land in Kalaburagi district registered in the minor's name. The court found the sale justified as the property is located over 200 km away from the family's residence in Hyderabad, making agricultural activity impractical, and authorized the mother to reinvest the sale proceeds in purchasing property for the minor in Hyderabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts