Ramulu son of Husenappa @ Hasanappa Bakki age 52 yrs resident of shilarkot villge vs Sayappa son of Narasappa age 33 yrs resident of shilarkot — 354/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341323324504506rw34ofIPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB710007442024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
354/2024
Filing Date
13-08-2014
Registration No
354/2024
Registration Date
13-08-2014
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
MUDHOL PS
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramulu son of Husenappa @ Hasanappa Bakki age 52 yrs resident of shilarkot villge
Adv. state
Respondent(s)
Sayappa son of Narasappa age 33 yrs resident of shilarkot
Maipal S/o Ashanna Bakki Age 35 yrs Occ Agri R/o Shilarkot
Sayappa S/o Bakki Age 40 yrs Occ Agriculture
Sayalu S/o Bakki Age 42 yrs Occ Agriculture R/o Shilarkot
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 02-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 15-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary of CC No. 354/2024 The court heard witness testimony on 27-03-2026. A retired ASI (age 66) testified regarding an FIR filed on 01.03.2014 based on a complaint by Ramulu (petitioner). The witness detailed investigation proceedings including statement recording, seizure of a structure, and submission of a final investigation report on 31.03.2014. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the credibility of the witness and investigation procedures. The court admitted the witness statement into record and the case proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CC No. 354/2024 The court heard witness testimony on 27-03-2026. A retired ASI (age 66) testified regarding an FIR filed on 01.03.2014 based on a complaint by Ramulu (petitioner). The witness detailed investigation proceedings including statement recording, seizure of a structure, and submission of a final investigation report on 31.03.2014. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the credibility of the witness and investigation procedures. The court admitted the witness statement into record and the case proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts