Sidramappa S/o Gurulingappa Age 62 years Occ Agril, R/o Sheklad Palli. vs Parvatamma W/o Doddsharanappa, Age 68 years Occ Household R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam. — 88/2022
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710002892022
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
88/2022
Filing Date
29-10-2022
Registration No
88/2022
Registration Date
29-10-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sidramappa S/o Gurulingappa Age 62 years Occ Agril, R/o Sheklad Palli.
Adv. Satish Patil
Baswaraj S/o Mahadevappa, Age 38 years, Occ Agril, R/o Sheklad Palli Tq Sedam.
Respondent(s)
Parvatamma W/o Doddsharanappa, Age 68 years Occ Household R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Sugappa alias Suganna S/o Doddsharanappa, Age about 49 years, Occ Agril, R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Nagaraj S/o Doddsharanappa, Age about 45 years, Occ Agril, R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Ravi s/o Doddsharanappa Age about 40 years Occ Agril, R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Vijalaxmi W/o Mahadevappa Awanti Age 60 years, Occ Household R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Mallikarjun S/o Mahadevappa Age 36 years, Occ Agril, R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Bannappa S/o Mahadevappa Age 33 years, Occ Agril, R/o Shekladpalli Tq Sedam.
Nandini W/o Bannappa Awanti, Occ Household, r/o Shekladpalli, Tq Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 07-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 88/2022, the court examined the testimony of a witness (DW-1) on 01-07-2025 in a civil suit concerning property succession and inheritance rights. The witness's testimony regarding family relationships, heirship claims of defendants 1-4 and 5-8, and alleged false documents was found to contain contradictions and inconsistencies. The court concluded that no further examination of this witness is required, and the case proceedings continue with the recorded testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 88/2022, the court examined the testimony of a witness (DW-1) on 01-07-2025 in a civil suit concerning property succession and inheritance rights. The witness's testimony regarding family relationships, heirship claims of defendants 1-4 and 5-8, and alleged false documents was found to contain contradictions and inconsistencies. The court concluded that no further examination of this witness is required, and the case proceedings continue with the recorded testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts