Hanamanth s/o Sabanna Boundler, 44 yrs, R/o Handarki, Tq. Sedam. vs Chandrashekar s/o Sharanappa, 42 yrs, R/o H. No. 5/44, Handarki, Tq. Sedam. — 1464/2023

Case under 166 Imv Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB710002782023

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1248/2023

Filing Date

28-08-2023

Registration No

1464/2023

Registration Date

03-11-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM

Judge

650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

Acts & Sections

166 IMV ACT Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Hanamanth s/o Sabanna Boundler, 44 yrs, R/o Handarki, Tq. Sedam.

Adv. SRI V S REDDY

Respondent(s)

Chandrashekar s/o Sharanappa, 42 yrs, R/o H. No. 5/44, Handarki, Tq. Sedam.

The Manager, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd, PB No. 215, 289/12, II floor, AM Arcade, CG Hospital

Hearing History

Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

22-11-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

08-10-2024
Issue
27-11-2024
Deposition
08-01-2025
Deposition
21-02-2025
Orders
02-07-2025
Deposition

Case Summary MVC No. 1464/2023 The court ordered the petitioner to obtain medical certificates (marked as NI-20 and NI-21) from the district hospital with the concerned doctor present, after finding that fraudulent/false certificates had been previously submitted from the government hospital. The main hearing was adjourned, and the case will continue after the petitioner complies with this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary MVC No. 1464/2023 The court ordered the petitioner to obtain medical certificates (marked as NI-20 and NI-21) from the district hospital with the concerned doctor present, after finding that fraudulent/false certificates had been previously submitted from the government hospital. The main hearing was adjourned, and the case will continue after the petitioner complies with this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case