Gundappa s/o Late Basawaraj Malipatil, 28 yrs, R/o H. No. 175, Ashraya Colony, Udagi road, Sedam. vs Chennamma @ Channamma w/o Gundappa Malipatil d/o Hanmanth @ Hanmanthrao, 25 yrs, R/o Sedam — 37/2023
Case under U/s 13 B of Hindu Marriage Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
M.C. - MATRIMONIAL CASES
CNR: KAKB710002722023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
37/2023
Filing Date
04-11-2023
Registration No
37/2023
Registration Date
04-11-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gundappa s/o Late Basawaraj Malipatil, 28 yrs, R/o H. No. 175, Ashraya Colony, Udagi road, Sedam.
Adv. RUDRAWAR NARAYANREDDY
Respondent(s)
Chennamma @ Channamma w/o Gundappa Malipatil d/o Hanmanth @ Hanmanthrao, 25 yrs, R/o Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 04-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court annulled the marriage under Hindu Marriage Act Section 12(1)(d), finding the wife was pregnant by another person at the time of marriage. Medical evidence showed pregnancy of approximately 24 weeks on the marriage date (22.05.2023), with a fully mature baby born just over 4 months later. DNA testing conclusively excluded the husband as the biological father, corroborating the court's finding that he had no access to the wife during conception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court annulled the marriage under Hindu Marriage Act Section 12(1)(d), finding the wife was pregnant by another person at the time of marriage. Medical evidence showed pregnancy of approximately 24 weeks on the marriage date (22.05.2023), with a fully mature baby born just over 4 months later. DNA testing conclusively excluded the husband as the biological father, corroborating the court's finding that he had no access to the wife during conception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts