Durgamma Wo Bhimappa Gollar Age 65 yrs occ Agri Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam vs Padamma Wo Humappa Age 45 yrs occ Agri Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam — 4/2015
Case under U/s 54 of Cpc Section 54ofCPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKB710001872015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2015
Filing Date
14-10-2015
Registration No
4/2015
Registration Date
16-10-2015
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Durgamma Wo Bhimappa Gollar Age 65 yrs occ Agri Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam
Adv. S K D ADV
Shekamma W Shakuntala Do Bhimappa Gollar
Chandramma @ Chandrakala Do Bhimappa Gollar
Prabhakar So Bhimappa Gollar
Kantamma Wo Ramulu age 38yrs occ agri Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam
Lalitamma Wo Fakirappa age 25 yrs occ agri Ro Kadalapur Tq Sedam
Respondent(s)
Padamma Wo Humappa Age 45 yrs occ Agri Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam
Lakshmamma Mo Padamamma age 28yrs occ household Ro Kottapalli Tq Sedam
Shashikala Do Bhimappa
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
HEARING
HEARING
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary The court accepted petitioner No.4's memo and directed respondents No.4 to 6 to deposit the income from agricultural crop proceeds from suit properties No.1 and 2 with the FDP Court, as per the High Court's stay order dated 24.02.2026. The respondents' claim that the receiver harvested all crops was rejected as insufficient evidence, and they were warned of contempt action if they fail to comply. The case is scheduled for final call on 18.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court accepted petitioner No.4's memo and directed respondents No.4 to 6 to deposit the income from agricultural crop proceeds from suit properties No.1 and 2 with the FDP Court, as per the High Court's stay order dated 24.02.2026. The respondents' claim that the receiver harvested all crops was rejected as insufficient evidence, and they were warned of contempt action if they fail to comply. The case is scheduled for final call on 18.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts