Smt. Mallamma W/o Raghavendra Channakki D/o Ramlingappa Halloor Age 31yrs Occ Agril, R/o Hulgol.(Legal Heir) vs Ramlingappa S/o Hanmanth Hallor R/o Benakanahalli Tq Sedam since died. — 11/2019
Case under U/s 54 of Cpc Section 54. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKB710001742019
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
11/2019
Filing Date
19-12-2019
Registration No
11/2019
Registration Date
19-12-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Mallamma W/o Raghavendra Channakki D/o Ramlingappa Halloor Age 31yrs Occ Agril, R/o Hulgol.(Legal Heir)
Adv. R Narayan Reddy
Respondent(s)
Ramlingappa S/o Hanmanth Hallor R/o Benakanahalli Tq Sedam since died.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 18-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 06-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: F.D.P No. 11/2019 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application with no cost. The Taluka Tahasildar was appointed as court commissioner to effect partition of landed properties, and an advocate was appointed as commissioner to effect partition of the house property, each with a fixed fee of Rs. 2,000. Context: Following an earlier decree in partition suit O.S. No. 45/2018 (which allotted the petitioner a 1/4th share), the petitioner filed final decree proceedings. After modification of the preliminary decree in September 2022, the petitioner sought appointment of commissioners to execute the partition of both landed and house properties. The respondents did not oppose the application, and the court found valid grounds to approve the request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: F.D.P No. 11/2019 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application with no cost. The Taluka Tahasildar was appointed as court commissioner to effect partition of landed properties, and an advocate was appointed as commissioner to effect partition of the house property, each with a fixed fee of Rs. 2,000. Context: Following an earlier decree in partition suit O.S. No. 45/2018 (which allotted the petitioner a 1/4th share), the petitioner filed final decree proceedings. After modification of the preliminary decree in September 2022, the petitioner sought appointment of commissioners to execute the partition of both landed and house properties. The respondents did not oppose the application, and the court found valid grounds to approve the request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts