Bangaramma Wo Yankappa Waddar Age 60 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam now Ro at Kodla village Tq vs Yallappa So Tippanna Waddar Age 65 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam — 44/2014
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 35ofKCFANDSVACT. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710001362014
Filing Number
44/2014
Filing Date
05-09-2014
Registration No
44/2014
Registration Date
10-09-2014
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bangaramma Wo Yankappa Waddar Age 60 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam now Ro at Kodla village Tq
Adv. N R ADV
Baswaraj So Yankappa Waddarr Age 30 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam now residing at village Kodla
Respondent(s)
Yallappa So Tippanna Waddar Age 65 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam
Sanjappa Sanna So Tippanna Waddar Age 58 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam
Lachmamma Wo Motalayya Waddar Age 61 yrs occ House hold Ro Kasturpalli Kodangal mandal Dist Mehab(Legal Heir)
Anjappa So Tippanna Waddar Age 22 yrs occ agri Ro Sindhanamadu Now Ro Pakal Tq Sedam
Hussainappa So Nagappa Waddar Age 50 yrs occ Agri Ro Sindhanmadu now Ro Pakal Tq Sedam
Srinivas So Sanna Sanjappa Waddar Age 25 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam
Kashappa So Yallappa Waddar Age 32 yrs occ Agri Ro Pakal Tq Sedam Dist Gulbarga
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
In OS No.44/2014, the Senior Civil Judge, Sedam dismissed the suit for non-prosecution. The court found that the principal witness (PW.1) failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities, and the defendant's request for additional time was rejected. With no evidence on record and the witness unavailable for cross-examination, the suit was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
In OS No.44/2014, the Senior Civil Judge, Sedam dismissed the suit for non-prosecution. The court found that the principal witness (PW.1) failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities, and the defendant's request for additional time was rejected. With no evidence on record and the witness unavailable for cross-examination, the suit was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts