Mahadevappa S/o Sabanna Kanagadda Age 30yrs Occ Pvt.Service R/o Sedam, Tq Sedam, Dist Kalaburagi. vs Jaganath S/o Sabanna Kanagadda Age40yrs Occ Coolie R/o Hamal Quarters Chincholi road sedam Tq Sedam — 33/2019
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710001262019
Filing Number
33/2019
Filing Date
29-08-2019
Registration No
33/2019
Registration Date
29-08-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadevappa S/o Sabanna Kanagadda Age 30yrs Occ Pvt.Service R/o Sedam, Tq Sedam, Dist Kalaburagi.
Adv. RAJENDRA R.MUNNUR
Respondent(s)
Jaganath S/o Sabanna Kanagadda Age40yrs Occ Coolie R/o Hamal Quarters Chincholi road sedam Tq Sedam
Hanamanth S/o Sabanna Kanagadda Age 57years Occ Coolie R/o Holitippi Sedam Tq Sedam,Dist Kalaburagi
Vasanth S/o Sabanna Kanagassa Age31yrs Occ Pvt.Service R/o Hamal Quarters Chincholi road Sedam,
Sangeeta w/o Ranoji, 40 yrs, R/o Bahavani Nagar, Kalaburagi.
Mahadevi w/o Vithal, 34 yrs, R/o Ramthirth, Tq. Chincholi.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS 33/2019 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit and partly decreed defendant No. 2's counter claim. The plaintiff and all defendants (including two sisters added in counter claim) are entitled to equal 1/6th shares each in three properties and a bank account amount of Rs. 10,32,076/-. Key Reasoning: The court found that suit properties were ancestral/joint family assets purchased by their father Sabanna, not self-acquired property of defendant No. 2 as he claimed. Bank records proved defendant No. 1 transferred the deceased father's pension account balance to himself; this amount is divisible equally among all six heirs under Hindu Succession Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 33/2019 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff's partition suit and partly decreed defendant No. 2's counter claim. The plaintiff and all defendants (including two sisters added in counter claim) are entitled to equal 1/6th shares each in three properties and a bank account amount of Rs. 10,32,076/-. Key Reasoning: The court found that suit properties were ancestral/joint family assets purchased by their father Sabanna, not self-acquired property of defendant No. 2 as he claimed. Bank records proved defendant No. 1 transferred the deceased father's pension account balance to himself; this amount is divisible equally among all six heirs under Hindu Succession Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts