Vijaylaxmi vs Babamma Advocate - VIJAYKUMAR MISKIN — 2/2026

Case Summary: FDP No. 2/2026 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge allowed the final decree petition, rejecting the court commissioner's partition report. The court allotted entire suit item No. 2 to defendants and subsequently to purchaser Respondent No. 5 (who bought from Defendant No. 3), while allotting entire suit items No. 1 and 3 to petitioner Vijayalaxmi to equalize shares and accommodate the mid-litigation property purchase. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the commissioner's report because equities arising from Respondent No. 5's purchase during litigation could not be worked out based on the existing report. The court then recalculated shares: since the plaintiff was entitled to 66.5 guntas from item No. 2 but entire item No. 2 went to defendants/purchaser, she received complete items No. 1 and 3 instead—approximately 4-5 guntas less but more convenient for agricultural operations as consolidated holdings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.