Farzana vs Nizmuddin — 14/2025
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710000412025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
25-01-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
25-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Farzana
Adv. Hossalliker LalAhmed
Respondent(s)
Nizmuddin
Ameer Bee
Adam
Ahmed Rafiq
Abdul Rahim
Naimunnisa Begum
Raghavendra
Ameen Begum
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 07-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted an ex parte temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating the suit properties until the next hearing date (12-03-2025). The plaintiff, claiming to be a co-heir of ancestral property, established a prima facie case showing the balance of convenience favors her protection. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, or the order stands automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted an ex parte temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating the suit properties until the next hearing date (12-03-2025). The plaintiff, claiming to be a co-heir of ancestral property, established a prima facie case showing the balance of convenience favors her protection. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, or the order stands automatically vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts