Venkatesh s/o Sharanappa Talwar, 38 yrs, R/o Shantnagar, Bhankur, Tq. Shahabad, now at Jiledpalli, vs Basavaraj C. C. s/o Chandrayya, 32 yrs, R/o H. No. 47/27, Katmanallur, Virgonagar — 98/2025
Case under 166 Imv Act Section 166. Status: Arguments-CIVIL. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB710000372025
Filing Number
16/2025
Filing Date
07-Jan-2025
Registration No
98/2025
Registration Date
21-Jan-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Venkatesh s/o Sharanappa Talwar, 38 yrs, R/o Shantnagar, Bhankur, Tq. Shahabad, now at Jiledpalli,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Basavaraj C. C. s/o Chandrayya, 32 yrs, R/o H. No. 47/27, Katmanallur, Virgonagar
-
2.The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Second century complex, opp. Sangama Talkies, Brahamap
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-May-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
02-May-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
29-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
22-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
19-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: MVC No. 98/2025 This motor vehicle accident case involved petitioner Venkatesh, a school teacher, who was injured in a collision with a tanker truck on 22.07.2024. The court examined PW-1 (witness) testimony on 19-02-2026, wherein the witness made statements regarding the accident circumstances, petitioner's injuries, medical treatment costs (₹60,000), and loss of wages during 20 days of hospitalization. The court found the witness testimony contained false statements and fabricated evidence, including forged medical bills and inflated claims. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting discrepancies in the witness's account regarding accident liability and damages claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2026
Respondent Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
28-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-Dec-2025
IssueView PDF
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
22-Nov-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
27-Sep-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
23-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
11-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
06-Aug-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
18-Jun-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
16-Apr-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
20-Mar-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC , Sedam.
-
24-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2025
Case Summary: MVC No. 98/2025 This motor vehicle accident case involved petitioner Venkatesh, a school teacher, who was injured in a collision with a tanker truck on 22.07.2024. The court examined PW-1 (witness) testimony on 19-02-2026, wherein the witness made statements regarding the accident circumstances, petitioner's injuries, medical treatment costs (₹60,000), and loss of wages during 20 days of hospitalization. The court found the witness testimony contained false statements and fabricated evidence, including forged medical bills and inflated claims. The case was adjourned for further proceedings, with the court noting discrepancies in the witness's account regarding accident liability and damages claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts