Shakera Begum alias Shakeera Begum vs Dastagir — 158/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,2,26. Status: Issues.. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Issues. Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB620028012025

e-Filing Number

23-09-2025

Filing Number

160/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

158/2025

Registration Date

27-Sep-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,2,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shakera Begum alias Shakeera Begum

    Adv. Lingaraju Marageppa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dastagir

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 158/2025 Summary: On 11.12.2025, the court examined a witness and recorded sworn testimony. The petitioner's counsel affirmed that all main hearing evidence was authentic and provided supporting information. Two documentary exhibits were marked as annexures 1-2, and a digital response was marked as annexure 3. The petitioner's counsel requested and was granted adjournment for the main hearing to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  10. 27-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 158/2025 Summary: On 11.12.2025, the court examined a witness and recorded sworn testimony. The petitioner's counsel affirmed that all main hearing evidence was authentic and provided supporting information. Two documentary exhibits were marked as annexures 1-2, and a digital response was marked as annexure 3. The petitioner's counsel requested and was granted adjournment for the main hearing to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case