Chandamma alias Tippamma W/o Mallappa Baichbal. D/o Saibanna Hadpad. Age.55 Yrs. Occ.Agri and House vs Subhadramma W/o Krishnappa. D/o Saibanna Hadpad. Age.60 Yrs. Occ.Household and Agri. R/o Kolkunda. — 166/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB620021892022

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

160/2022

Filing Date

05-11-2022

Registration No

166/2022

Registration Date

02-12-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

Chandamma alias Tippamma W/o Mallappa Baichbal. D/o Saibanna Hadpad. Age.55 Yrs. Occ.Agri and House

Adv. B.S.Patil

Respondent(s)

Subhadramma W/o Krishnappa. D/o Saibanna Hadpad. Age.60 Yrs. Occ.Household and Agri. R/o Kolkunda.

Chandamma W/o Basavaraj alias Bassappa Hadpad. D/o Krishnappa. Age.35 Yrs. Occ.Household and Agri.

Basavaraj alias Basappa S/o Mallappa Hadpad. Age.43 Yrs. Occ.Agri. R/o village Rajwal. Tq. Jewargi.

Hearing History

Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

24-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

11-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

18-10-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

18-09-2025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Interim Orders

20-03-2025
Deposition
11-12-2025
Deposition

In O.S. No. 166/2022, on 11.12.2025, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The main trial proceedings continued with the plaintiff's counsel confirming the correctness of the affidavit documents. The court directed that plaintiff's claims in clauses 2 and 3 be adjourned pending the defendant's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 166/2022, on 11.12.2025, the court recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The main trial proceedings continued with the plaintiff's counsel confirming the correctness of the affidavit documents. The court directed that plaintiff's claims in clauses 2 and 3 be adjourned pending the defendant's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case