Anita W/o Revanasidda Rathod. Age.28 Yrs. Occ.Household. R/o Kakhandaki. Tq. Yadrami. vs Lachchu S/o Dhiru Rathod. Age.68 Yrs. Occ.Agri.R/o Kakhandagi.Tq.Yadrami. — 155/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,of,Rule,1,and2,ofCPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620019772022
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
154/2022
Filing Date
17-10-2022
Registration No
155/2022
Registration Date
21-10-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anita W/o Revanasidda Rathod. Age.28 Yrs. Occ.Household. R/o Kakhandaki. Tq. Yadrami.
Adv. K.M.Kudalagi.
Vaishaili D/o Revanasidda Rathod. Age.6 Yrs. Occ.Student.R/o Utnal. Tq. and Dist.Vijayapur.
Respondent(s)
Lachchu S/o Dhiru Rathod. Age.68 Yrs. Occ.Agri.R/o Kakhandagi.Tq.Yadrami.
Pulabai W/o Lachchu Rathod. Age.60 Yrs. Occ.H.H.Work. R/o Kakhandaki. Tq. Yadrami.
Minoj S/o Lachchu Rathod. Age.35 Yrs. Occ.Agri. R/o Kakhandaki.Tq.Yadrami.
Arjun S/o Lachchu Rathod.Age.32 Yrs. Occ.Agri. R/o Kakhandaki. Tq. Yadrami.
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 155/2022 Outcome: Petition dismissed. On 10.01.2025, the court examined the petitioner's witness and recorded her sworn statement in a property dispute case. The witness testimony established that the petitioner (Anita) has no legal rights or share in the disputed property belonging to the respondents (Lachchu, Pulabai, and Minoj Rathod). The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 155/2022 Outcome: Petition dismissed. On 10.01.2025, the court examined the petitioner's witness and recorded her sworn statement in a property dispute case. The witness testimony established that the petitioner (Anita) has no legal rights or share in the disputed property belonging to the respondents (Lachchu, Pulabai, and Minoj Rathod). The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts