Shantamma W/o Channappa Malled Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami. vs Basawaraj S/o Siddappa Hawaldar Age 65 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami. — 96/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620017002021
Filing Number
94/2021
Filing Date
16-Sep-2021
Registration No
96/2021
Registration Date
23-Sep-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantamma W/o Channappa Malled Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami.
Adv. J.V.HATTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Basawaraj S/o Siddappa Hawaldar Age 65 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami.
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
13-Feb-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
09-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 96/2021 Order Date: 09.01.2026 Outcome: The court found the plaintiff's case to be based on false claims and fabricated documents. The court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiff filed false statements, presented forged exhibits (NIP-28, NIP-29, NIP-30), and produced false witnesses to support baseless claims regarding land ownership and possession. The plaintiff was found to have submitted a false suit with false evidence and false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Aug-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
05-Dec-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
06-Jun-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Nov-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
03-Aug-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
30-Jun-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
24-Feb-2023
IssueView PDF
-
24-Feb-2023
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
09-Feb-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Jan-2023
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Nov-2022
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
11-Oct-2022
OrdersView PDF
-
11-Oct-2022
Notice
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Sep-2022
Orders
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Aug-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
11-Aug-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Jul-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Jul-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
04-Jun-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
05-Mar-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
10-Jan-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Jan-2022
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Dec-2021
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
20-Nov-2021
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
27-Sep-2021
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
24-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2021
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 96/2021 Order Date: 09.01.2026 Outcome: The court found the plaintiff's case to be based on false claims and fabricated documents. The court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiff filed false statements, presented forged exhibits (NIP-28, NIP-29, NIP-30), and produced false witnesses to support baseless claims regarding land ownership and possession. The plaintiff was found to have submitted a false suit with false evidence and false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts