Shantamma W/o Channappa Malled Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami. vs Basawaraj S/o Siddappa Hawaldar Age 65 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami. — 96/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620017002021
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
94/2021
Filing Date
16-09-2021
Registration No
96/2021
Registration Date
23-09-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shantamma W/o Channappa Malled Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami.
Adv. J.V.HATTI
Respondent(s)
Basawaraj S/o Siddappa Hawaldar Age 65 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Balabatti Tq Yedrami.
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 13-02-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 09-01-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 21-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 25-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 96/2021 Order Date: 09.01.2026 Outcome: The court found the plaintiff's case to be based on false claims and fabricated documents. The court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiff filed false statements, presented forged exhibits (NIP-28, NIP-29, NIP-30), and produced false witnesses to support baseless claims regarding land ownership and possession. The plaintiff was found to have submitted a false suit with false evidence and false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. No. 96/2021 Order Date: 09.01.2026 Outcome: The court found the plaintiff's case to be based on false claims and fabricated documents. The court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiff filed false statements, presented forged exhibits (NIP-28, NIP-29, NIP-30), and produced false witnesses to support baseless claims regarding land ownership and possession. The plaintiff was found to have submitted a false suit with false evidence and false testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts