The State Through Yedrami PS vs Veena W/o Gururaj Hurgadli. Age. 49 Yrs. Occ. Household. R/o Golgeri. Tq. Sindagi. Dist. Vijayapur. — 661/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/Sec.447,323,504,506,509R/w34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB620011422022
Filing Number
661/2022
Filing Date
04-Jul-2022
Registration No
661/2022
Registration Date
05-Jul-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Through Yedrami PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Veena W/o Gururaj Hurgadli. Age. 49 Yrs. Occ. Household. R/o Golgeri. Tq. Sindagi. Dist. Vijayapur.
-
2.Hanamanth S/o Mareppa Yantaman. Age. 55 Yrs. Occ. Cooli. R/o Honnalli. Tq. Sindagi. Dist. Vijayapur.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Court Judgment The Jewargi JMFC court acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 447, 323, 504, 509, 506, and 34 in a land dispute case involving alleged trespassing, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inconsistencies in witness testimonies, civil disputes underlying the case, and insufficient evidence of specific threatening language used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
05-Mar-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Feb-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
03-Feb-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
22-Jan-2026
313 StatementView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
09-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
17-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
22-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
27-May-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-May-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence-Criminal
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
02-Jan-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
21-Oct-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
30-Aug-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
04-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
06-May-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Feb-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
11-Jan-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Nov-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
06-Sep-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 661/2022
Summary of Court Judgment The Jewargi JMFC court acquitted all three accused under IPC Sections 447, 323, 504, 509, 506, and 34 in a land dispute case involving alleged trespassing, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inconsistencies in witness testimonies, civil disputes underlying the case, and insufficient evidence of specific threatening language used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts