Manjula W/o Naganna Sutar (D/o Vithal Rao) Age 34 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Janiwar Tq Jewargi vs Shantamma W/o Shivappa Bachimathi Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Janiwar Tq Jewargi. — 48/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments-CIVIL. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620011192021
Filing Number
44/2021
Filing Date
24-Jun-2021
Registration No
48/2021
Registration Date
26-Jun-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manjula W/o Naganna Sutar (D/o Vithal Rao) Age 34 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Janiwar Tq Jewargi
Adv. J.V.HATTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shantamma W/o Shivappa Bachimathi Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Janiwar Tq Jewargi.
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In OS No. 48/2021, the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff claimed she received Rs. 3,62,000 from a property sale on 25.07.2017 but alleged the defendant fraudulently withheld the property and made false claims. The court found the plaintiff's testimony to contain false statements and sworn affidavits, noting that no civil case had been filed despite the plaintiff's alleged loss of possession. The petition was dismissed as the court ruled the plaintiff has no valid rights or claims over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
24-Jan-2026
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Dec-2025
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
31-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
26-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
05-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
28-Jun-2025
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
27-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
30-May-2024
Issues.
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
02-Mar-2024
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
20-Jan-2024
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
15-Dec-2023
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
02-Nov-2023
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Sep-2023
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
14-Sep-2023
Summons
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
12-Sep-2023
Restored
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
25-Nov-2021
JudgmentView PDF
-
25-Nov-2021
DecreeView PDF
-
25-Nov-2021
Disposed
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
19-Nov-2021
Judgments
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
30-Oct-2021
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
18-Sep-2021
Arguments-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
27-Aug-2021
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Aug-2021
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
29-Jul-2021
OrdersView PDF
-
29-Jul-2021
Evidence-CIVIL
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
22-Jul-2021
Orders
CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi
-
28-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2021
Summary: In OS No. 48/2021, the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff claimed she received Rs. 3,62,000 from a property sale on 25.07.2017 but alleged the defendant fraudulently withheld the property and made false claims. The court found the plaintiff's testimony to contain false statements and sworn affidavits, noting that no civil case had been filed despite the plaintiff's alleged loss of possession. The petition was dismissed as the court ruled the plaintiff has no valid rights or claims over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts