Neelamma @ Laxmibai W/o Late. Mallappa @ Mallikarjun.Age.48 Yrs. Occ.Agri.R/o Andola Tq.Jewargi. vs Honamma W/o alleged Mallappa @ Mallikarjun Age.40 Yrs. Occ.Private Service R/o Ambanna Anegundi Hou — 50/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,2. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620009162024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2024
Filing Date
30-05-2024
Registration No
50/2024
Registration Date
30-05-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neelamma @ Laxmibai W/o Late. Mallappa @ Mallikarjun.Age.48 Yrs. Occ.Agri.R/o Andola Tq.Jewargi.
Adv. Ramchandra K
Kartik S/o Late. Mallappa @ Mallikarjun.Age.23 Yrs. Occ.Student R/o Andola Tq.Jewargi.Dist.Kalaburag
Kaveri D/o Late. Mallappa @ Mallikarjun Age.19 Yrs. Occ.Student R/o Andola Tq.Jewargi.
Respondent(s)
Honamma W/o alleged Mallappa @ Mallikarjun Age.40 Yrs. Occ.Private Service R/o Ambanna Anegundi Hou
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
A.D.R.
ORDERS
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 06-01-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 28-11-2025 | ORDERS | |
| 13-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 50/2024, Civil Judge & JMFC, Jewargi (dated 6 January 2026) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No. II) under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C., restraining the defendant from alienating, mortgaging, or creating charges over the disputed property pending final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and denial would cause irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 50/2024, Civil Judge & JMFC, Jewargi (dated 6 January 2026) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No. II) under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C., restraining the defendant from alienating, mortgaging, or creating charges over the disputed property pending final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and denial would cause irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts