Vijayalaxmi W/o Ravindra Siddannavar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 34 Yrs R/o Kalaburagi vs Gurulingappa S/o Late. Devappa Ballundagi Age 75 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Mandewal Tq.Jewargi. — 78/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26,R/W,U/O,VII,Rule,1,OfCPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620006802022
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
77/2022
Filing Date
02-06-2022
Registration No
78/2022
Registration Date
10-06-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijayalaxmi W/o Ravindra Siddannavar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 34 Yrs R/o Kalaburagi
Adv. J.V.HATTI
Savitri W/o Sidramappa Biradar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 30 Yrs R/o Konasirasagi. Tq Yedrami
Respondent(s)
Gurulingappa S/o Late. Devappa Ballundagi Age 75 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Mandewal Tq.Jewargi.
Sangamma W/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi. Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi.
Ningamma W/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi
Bhagamma W/o Bassanna Mudagi Age 28 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Kannolli Tq Sindagi.
Boramma alias Jyoti W/o Revanasidda Age 26 Yrs Occ Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi
Revanasiddappa S/o Basalingappa Gaddad Age 34 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi
Yeshwantraya S/o Shivaraya Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi
Shivaputra S/o Bassanna Kori Age 45 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 01-04-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 30-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 14-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 07-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Case No. O.S. 78/2022 - Summary The court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving five defendants and determined their ages and relationships based on school records. The court found that Defendant 1 sold property in multiple transactions (1995, 1998, 2014, 2021) without proper consent from the plaintiffs, and concluded that Defendants 1, 4, and 5 are the rightful owners of the disputed property. The petition was dismissed as the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any legal claim, finding their case to be frivolous and lacking merit. No further hearing scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. O.S. 78/2022 - Summary The court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving five defendants and determined their ages and relationships based on school records. The court found that Defendant 1 sold property in multiple transactions (1995, 1998, 2014, 2021) without proper consent from the plaintiffs, and concluded that Defendants 1, 4, and 5 are the rightful owners of the disputed property. The petition was dismissed as the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any legal claim, finding their case to be frivolous and lacking merit. No further hearing scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts