Vijayalaxmi W/o Ravindra Siddannavar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 34 Yrs R/o Kalaburagi vs Gurulingappa S/o Late. Devappa Ballundagi Age 75 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Mandewal Tq.Jewargi. — 78/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26,R/W,U/O,VII,Rule,1,OfCPC. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Evidence-CIVIL Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB620006802022

Filing Number

77/2022

Filing Date

02-Jun-2022

Registration No

78/2022

Registration Date

10-Jun-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26,R/W,U/O,VII,Rule,1,OfCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijayalaxmi W/o Ravindra Siddannavar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 34 Yrs R/o Kalaburagi

    Adv. J.V.HATTI

  2. 2.Savitri W/o Sidramappa Biradar (D/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi) Age 30 Yrs R/o Konasirasagi. Tq Yedrami

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gurulingappa S/o Late. Devappa Ballundagi Age 75 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Mandewal Tq.Jewargi.

  2. 2.Sangamma W/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi. Age 52 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi.

  3. 3.Ningamma W/o Gurulingappa Ballundagi Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri and Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi

  4. 4.Bhagamma W/o Bassanna Mudagi Age 28 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Kannolli Tq Sindagi.

  5. 5.Boramma alias Jyoti W/o Revanasidda Age 26 Yrs Occ Household R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi

  6. 6.Revanasiddappa S/o Basalingappa Gaddad Age 34 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi

  7. 7.Yeshwantraya S/o Shivaraya Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi

  8. 8.Shivaputra S/o Bassanna Kori Age 45 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Mandewal Tq Jewargi

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case No. O.S. 78/2022 - Summary The court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving five defendants and determined their ages and relationships based on school records. The court found that Defendant 1 sold property in multiple transactions (1995, 1998, 2014, 2021) without proper consent from the plaintiffs, and concluded that Defendants 1, 4, and 5 are the rightful owners of the disputed property. The petition was dismissed as the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any legal claim, finding their case to be frivolous and lacking merit. No further hearing scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 15-Nov-2025

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  14. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  16. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  18. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  19. 22-Feb-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  20. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  21. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  22. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  23. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  24. 28-Sep-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  25. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  26. 27-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 27-Jul-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  28. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  29. 04-Apr-2024

    IssueView PDF

  30. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  31. 03-Feb-2024

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  32. 17-Nov-2023

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  33. 26-Oct-2023

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  34. 15-Sep-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  35. 24-Jul-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  36. 17-Jun-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  37. 25-May-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  38. 23-Mar-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  39. 10-Feb-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  40. 05-Jan-2023

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  41. 17-Nov-2022

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  42. 09-Sep-2022

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  43. 06-Aug-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  44. 12-Jul-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  45. 14-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  46. 13-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 02-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 78/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case No. O.S. 78/2022 - Summary The court examined witness testimony regarding a property dispute involving five defendants and determined their ages and relationships based on school records. The court found that Defendant 1 sold property in multiple transactions (1995, 1998, 2014, 2021) without proper consent from the plaintiffs, and concluded that Defendants 1, 4, and 5 are the rightful owners of the disputed property. The petition was dismissed as the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any legal claim, finding their case to be frivolous and lacking merit. No further hearing scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case