Mahantappa alias Mahantesh S/o Shankrappa Yetnal Age 32 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Maganagera Tq Yedrami. vs Shankrappa S/o Late.Gollalappa Yetnal Age 63 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Maganagera Tq.Yadrami Dist.Kalaburagi — 71/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Sec, 26, R/W, U/O, VII, Rule, 1,Of CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620006262022
Filing Number
71/2022
Filing Date
25-05-2022
Registration No
71/2022
Registration Date
30-05-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahantappa alias Mahantesh S/o Shankrappa Yetnal Age 32 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Maganagera Tq Yedrami.
Adv. J.V.HATTI
Respondent(s)
Shankrappa S/o Late.Gollalappa Yetnal Age 63 Yrs Occ.Agri R/o Maganagera Tq.Yadrami Dist.Kalaburagi
Lalitabai allegad W/o Shankrappa Yetnal Age 40 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Maganagera Tq Yedrami
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Disposed
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 13-12-2025 | A.D.R. |
| 09-10-2025 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court (OS-71/2022, Jewargi JMFC) accepted the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under CPC Section 23, Rule 3, and decreed the suit accordingly. The court appointed D2 as minor guardian of D6 and permitted the compromise after verifying that it was voluntary, in the minor's interest, and not against any legal provisions. Each party bears their own costs, and the office is directed to draw the final decree as per the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court (OS-71/2022, Jewargi JMFC) accepted the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under CPC Section 23, Rule 3, and decreed the suit accordingly. The court appointed D2 as minor guardian of D6 and permitted the compromise after verifying that it was voluntary, in the minor's interest, and not against any legal provisions. Each party bears their own costs, and the office is directed to draw the final decree as per the compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts