Mohammed Ayyub Khaji S/o Mohamed Maheboob khaji Age 39 Yrs Occu.Agri R/o Jewargi Tq Jewargi. vs Chandrakath S/o Late Sharanappa Age 50 yrs Occ.Agri R/o Near RaghavendraTemple Laxmi chowk Jewargi — 74/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620003382019
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
74/2019
Filing Date
18-07-2019
Registration No
74/2019
Registration Date
25-07-2019
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Ayyub Khaji S/o Mohamed Maheboob khaji Age 39 Yrs Occu.Agri R/o Jewargi Tq Jewargi.
Adv. B.BASANNA
Respondent(s)
Chandrakath S/o Late Sharanappa Age 50 yrs Occ.Agri R/o Near RaghavendraTemple Laxmi chowk Jewargi
Laxmikanth S/o Late Sharanappa Age.52 Yrs Occu.Agri R/o Near Raghavendra Temple Laxmi chowk Jewargi
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 22-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No. 73/2019 and 74/2019, the court order dated 06-04-2023 addresses the evidence and documents presented by both parties. The court examined the oral arguments along with the written submissions and documentary evidence filed by the counsel. The judgment indicates that both parties were given adequate opportunity to present their case, and the court has considered all relevant materials including documents marked as Exhibits 9-12 before rendering its decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No. 73/2019 and 74/2019, the court order dated 06-04-2023 addresses the evidence and documents presented by both parties. The court examined the oral arguments along with the written submissions and documentary evidence filed by the counsel. The judgment indicates that both parties were given adequate opportunity to present their case, and the court has considered all relevant materials including documents marked as Exhibits 9-12 before rendering its decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts