Shivaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 28 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur vs Dattappa S/o Shankrappa Balagumpi Age 62 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur. — 39/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,VII,Rule,1and2,CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620003032022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2022
Filing Date
02-03-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
10-03-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 28 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur
Adv. Sri. S.B.khanapur
Respondent(s)
Dattappa S/o Shankrappa Balagumpi Age 62 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.
Nagaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 36 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.
Siddappa S/o Basavaraj Balagumpi Age 32 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Kalaburagi.
Paramananda S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 63 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.
Kallappa S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 60 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.
Gopllalappa S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 58 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
HEARING
HEARING
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 09-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 28-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
In O.S. No. 39/2022, the court on 26.09.2025 recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed the main examination evidence and the court accepted the defendant's objection that the parties are not in agreement. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In O.S. No. 39/2022, the court on 26.09.2025 recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed the main examination evidence and the court accepted the defendant's objection that the parties are not in agreement. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts