Shivaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 28 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur vs Dattappa S/o Shankrappa Balagumpi Age 62 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur. — 39/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,VII,Rule,1and2,CPC. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB620003032022

Filing Number

35/2022

Filing Date

02-Mar-2022

Registration No

39/2022

Registration Date

10-Mar-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,VII,Rule,1and2,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 28 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur

    Adv. Sri. S.B.khanapur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dattappa S/o Shankrappa Balagumpi Age 62 Yrs Occ. Agri R/o Mortagi Tq.Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.

  2. 2.Nagaraj S/o Dattappa Balagumpi Age 36 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.

  3. 3.Siddappa S/o Basavaraj Balagumpi Age 32 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Kalaburagi.

  4. 4.Paramananda S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 63 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.

  5. 5.Kallappa S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 60 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.

  6. 6.Gopllalappa S/o Mallikarjun Nagavi Age 58 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Moratagi Tq Sindagi Dist.Vijayapur.

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    In O.S. No. 39/2022, the court on 26.09.2025 recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed the main examination evidence and the court accepted the defendant's objection that the parties are not in agreement. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  11. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  12. 14-Mar-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  14. 21-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  16. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  17. 29-Jun-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  18. 05-Apr-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  19. 08-Feb-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  20. 24-Nov-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  21. 30-Sep-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  22. 11-Aug-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  23. 22-Jun-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  24. 25-Mar-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  25. 10-Feb-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  26. 09-Dec-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  27. 15-Oct-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  28. 19-Aug-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  29. 04-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  30. 21-Apr-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  31. 21-Mar-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  32. 19-Mar-2022

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  33. 11-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 02-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 39/2022, the court on 26.09.2025 recorded the affidavit evidence of witnesses. The plaintiff's counsel confirmed the main examination evidence and the court accepted the defendant's objection that the parties are not in agreement. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case