Imama Bi W/o. Late Maqtumsab, age 68- yrs occ household R/o. Mangaloor Tq. Yadrami vs Sakinabee W/o. Late Mahaboobsab age 65 yrs occ household R/o. Mangaloor Tq. Yadrami — 14/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7, 1, 2, 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB620001732024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
01-02-2024
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
01-02-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Imama Bi W/o. Late Maqtumsab, age 68- yrs occ household R/o. Mangaloor Tq. Yadrami
Adv. Bhasha Patel
Respondent(s)
Sakinabee W/o. Late Mahaboobsab age 65 yrs occ household R/o. Mangaloor Tq. Yadrami
Murtuza W/o. Late Dawalsab age 45 yrs occ agri R/o. Mangaloor Tq. Yadrami
Hearing History
Judge: 328-CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Jewargi
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 18-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 14/2024, the court held the main hearing on 11.08.2025 where witnesses were examined and affidavits were recorded. The plaintiff's counsel affirmed that all facts stated in the main affidavit are true, and various documents including survey records, forms, sketches, and reference materials were admitted as exhibits (NIPs 1-19). The defendant's counsel requested adjournment, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 14/2024, the court held the main hearing on 11.08.2025 where witnesses were examined and affidavits were recorded. The plaintiff's counsel affirmed that all facts stated in the main affidavit are true, and various documents including survey records, forms, sketches, and reference materials were admitted as exhibits (NIPs 1-19). The defendant's counsel requested adjournment, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts