Fathima W/o Mehumdmiyan Khanapur vs Rizwana Begum W/o Md.Yunus — 30/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB620001172026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

29/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

328-CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fathima W/o Mehumdmiyan Khanapur

    Adv. Bhimashankar Basanna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rizwana Begum W/o Md.Yunus

  2. 2.Kousar Begum W/o Gouse Pasha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case 30/2026 Summary: The Lok Adalat accepted a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Fathima and respondents Rizwana Begum and Kousar Begum, who had amicably settled their dispute. The court verified the parties' free and voluntary consent through affidavits and identity documents, confirmed the compromise violated no contract law provisions, and decreed the suit accordingly. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge JMFC,Jewargi

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 30/2026 Summary: The Lok Adalat accepted a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Fathima and respondents Rizwana Begum and Kousar Begum, who had amicably settled their dispute. The court verified the parties' free and voluntary consent through affidavits and identity documents, confirmed the compromise violated no contract law provisions, and decreed the suit accordingly. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case