Shreedevi D/o Subhash Rathod vs The Birth and Death Register office of the Tahsildar Jewargi Tq Jewargi Dist klb — 1101/2025

Case under Bdr Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB610022092025

Filing Number

1102/2025

Filing Date

21-Nov-2025

Registration No

1101/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bdr Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shreedevi D/o Subhash Rathod

    Adv. Shivaraj P. Kodchi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Birth and Death Register office of the Tahsildar Jewargi Tq Jewargi Dist klb

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The JMFC Jewargi court dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 1101/2025 for non-prosecution. The petitioner and counsel were repeatedly absent despite multiple adjournments and sufficient time being granted, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case and failure to lead evidence, leaving no grounds for further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  7. 22-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The JMFC Jewargi court dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 1101/2025 for non-prosecution. The petitioner and counsel were repeatedly absent despite multiple adjournments and sufficient time being granted, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case and failure to lead evidence, leaving no grounds for further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case