Amalappa S/o Parameshwarappa Parameshwaraya Since deceased by LRs vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP Now at Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur Dist Yadgir — 179/2024
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/o,21,Rule,11,ofCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAKB610021612024
Filing Number
179/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2024
Registration No
179/2024
Registration Date
13-11-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amalappa S/o Parameshwarappa Parameshwaraya Since deceased by LRs
Adv. Prabhugouda M Patil
a) Krishnamma W/o Late Amalappa Age 59yrs R/o Village Biriyal(K) Tq Jewargi Dist KLB
b) Parameshwar S/o Late Amalappa Ambalappa Age 39 yrs R/o Village Biriyal(K) Tq Jewargi Dist KLB
Respondent(s)
The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP Now at Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur Dist Yadgir
The Deputy Commissioner Mini Vidhan Soudha KLB
Managing Director KBJNL Liason Office PWD Offices Annexe Building IIIrd Floor KR Circle Bangalore
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Disposed
SUMMONS
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 24-01-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 03-01-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 13-12-2025 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 179/2024 - Summary The court dismissed the petition filed on 13-11-2024 for non-prosecution. Despite sufficient opportunities, the respondent (DHr) and their counsel failed to appear before the court or take effective steps in the matter. The court closed the petition for the time being but granted the respondent liberty to file a fresh petition subject to the applicable statute of limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 179/2024 - Summary The court dismissed the petition filed on 13-11-2024 for non-prosecution. Despite sufficient opportunities, the respondent (DHr) and their counsel failed to appear before the court or take effective steps in the matter. The court closed the petition for the time being but granted the respondent liberty to file a fresh petition subject to the applicable statute of limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts