Sharanamma W/o Ningappa Beerappagola vs Gous Babu S/o Abdul Samad — 1529/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB610017602025

Filing Number

1098/2025

Filing Date

30-Aug-2025

Registration No

1529/2025

Registration Date

30-Aug-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sharanamma W/o Ningappa Beerappagola

    Adv. Siddanna A Kallur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gous Babu S/o Abdul Samad

  2. 2.Future General Insurance company lts By Its Legal Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok-Adalat accepted a voluntary compromise settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.2 for Rs. 3,00,000 (without interest) payable within 3 months. The petition was allowed in terms of the joint memo, the claim against respondent No.1 was dismissed, and respondent No.2 was directed to deposit the settlement amount with the court for release to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1529/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalat accepted a voluntary compromise settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.2 for Rs. 3,00,000 (without interest) payable within 3 months. The petition was allowed in terms of the joint memo, the claim against respondent No.1 was dismissed, and respondent No.2 was directed to deposit the settlement amount with the court for release to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case