Shantayya S/o Late Karabasayya Hiremath Age 62R/o Now at V L Patil Kalyan MantaSai Mandir Road KLB vs Somanathayya S/o Late Karabasayya Age 80yrs R/o Bilawar tq Yadrami Dist KLB — 125/2024

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/o,26,R/w,U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB610016472024

Filing Number

126/2024

Filing Date

09-Aug-2024

Registration No

125/2024

Registration Date

09-Aug-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section U/o,26,R/w,U/o,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shantayya S/o Late Karabasayya Hiremath Age 62R/o Now at V L Patil Kalyan MantaSai Mandir Road KLB

    Adv. J V Hatti

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Somanathayya S/o Late Karabasayya Age 80yrs R/o Bilawar tq Yadrami Dist KLB

  2. 2.Karabasayya S/o Somanathayya Hiremath Age 42yrs R/o Yadrami Tq Yadrami Dist KLB

  3. 3.Gangadhar S/o Somanathayya Hiremath Age 38yrs R/ o Now at V.L Patil Kalyan Manta Sai Mandir Road KLB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge at Jewargi decreed the plaintiff's suit on March 6, 2026, declaring him the absolute owner and in possession of agricultural land (Sy.No.3, measuring 4 acres 31 guntas) in Kalaburagi district and permanently enjoining the defendants from interfering with his possession. The court found the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence (revenue records and prior judgment from OS No.200/2011) credible, while the defendants failed to provide any evidence despite opportunities, resulting in an adverse inference against their claims of joint ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Deposition

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Deposition

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  18. 06-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  19. 24-Jul-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  21. 02-May-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  22. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  23. 20-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  25. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 09-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 125/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge at Jewargi decreed the plaintiff's suit on March 6, 2026, declaring him the absolute owner and in possession of agricultural land (Sy.No.3, measuring 4 acres 31 guntas) in Kalaburagi district and permanently enjoining the defendants from interfering with his possession. The court found the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence (revenue records and prior judgment from OS No.200/2011) credible, while the defendants failed to provide any evidence despite opportunities, resulting in an adverse inference against their claims of joint ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case