Ayesha W/o Mohd Ayyub Suramedhani Age 30 yrs Occ Household vs Amareshgouda S/o Goudappa Gouda Malipatil Age 40 yrs Occ Agri and Owner — 988/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 06-Jun-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB610016182024

Filing Number

1017/2024

Filing Date

06-Jul-2024

Registration No

988/2024

Registration Date

23-Jul-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayesha W/o Mohd Ayyub Suramedhani Age 30 yrs Occ Household

    Adv. Siddanna Ammanna Kallur

  2. 2.Mohammed Noman S/o Mohd Ayyub Suramedhani Age 9 yrs Occ Nil U/g of natural mother ie petitioner No.1

  3. 3.Aliza Mahaveen S/o Mohd Ayyub Suramedhani Age 7 yrs Occ Nil U/g of natural mother ie petitioner No.1

  4. 4.Mohammed Adnan S/o Mohd Ayyub Suramedhani Age 6 yrs U/g of natural mother ie petitioner No.1

  5. 5.Rahmat Begum W/o Mohammed Ali Suramedhani Age 50yrs Occ Household

  6. 6.Mohammed Ali S/o Nadim Sab Suramedhani Age 60 yrs Occ Nil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amareshgouda S/o Goudappa Gouda Malipatil Age 40 yrs Occ Agri and Owner

  2. 2.National Insurance company limited through its divisional manager

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC 988/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves petitioners Ayesha and her two minor children seeking compensation from respondent Amareshgouda (vehicle owner) and National Insurance Company Limited following a motor vehicle accident. On 07-05-2026, a witness was examined and cross-examined. The respondent's counsel challenged the insurance policy validity and argued that no compensation should be awarded, alleging false evidence submission. The court recorded the witness testimony and the case appears to be in the evidence stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  4. 04-May-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    IssueView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  13. 13-Dec-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  15. 13-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 22-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  18. 12-Jul-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  21. 08-May-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  22. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  25. 08-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  27. 30-Aug-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  28. 01-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 988/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 988/2024 This Motor Vehicles Claim case involves petitioners Ayesha and her two minor children seeking compensation from respondent Amareshgouda (vehicle owner) and National Insurance Company Limited following a motor vehicle accident. On 07-05-2026, a witness was examined and cross-examined. The respondent's counsel challenged the insurance policy validity and argued that no compensation should be awarded, alleging false evidence submission. The court recorded the witness testimony and the case appears to be in the evidence stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case