Channappagouda S/o Bhimangouda by Lr Basangouda S/o Channappagouda Age 45Yrs R/o Kuralgera Tq Jewar vs The State through Spl Land Acquisition Officer UKP Award At Present Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur — 4/2021
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/Sec.18(3)B. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAKB610010472021
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2021
Filing Date
21-01-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Channappagouda S/o Bhimangouda by Lr Basangouda S/o Channappagouda Age 45Yrs R/o Kuralgera Tq Jewar
Adv. G A Patil
Respondent(s)
The State through Spl Land Acquisition Officer UKP Award At Present Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur
The Deputy Commissioner Vikas Soudha Main Road Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 30-01-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 13-12-2025 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Misc PW1 Basangouda 4/2021 Outcome: The witness was administered oath on 15-02-2025. The opposing party's counsel requested cross-examination time, which was granted. However, the opposing party failed to proceed with cross-examination despite sufficient opportunity, and no valid reason for further cross-examination was provided. The court accordingly concluded that there is no cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Misc PW1 Basangouda 4/2021 Outcome: The witness was administered oath on 15-02-2025. The opposing party's counsel requested cross-examination time, which was granted. However, the opposing party failed to proceed with cross-examination despite sufficient opportunity, and no valid reason for further cross-examination was provided. The court accordingly concluded that there is no cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts