Modinsab S/o Hussainsab vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP — 140/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,21,Rule,11,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAKB610008312025
Filing Number
140/2025
Filing Date
19-Jun-2025
Registration No
140/2025
Registration Date
19-Jun-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Modinsab S/o Hussainsab
Adv. PRABHUGOUDA MPatil
-
2.Rahemath Bi W/o Late Moddin Sab
-
3.Doul Sab S/o Late Moddin Sab
-
4.Jainabi W/o Late Daul Sab
-
5.Jafarsab S/o Hussainsab
-
6.Habeeb Sab S/o Late Jafar Sab
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP
-
2.The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The JMFC Jewargi court dismissed the execution petition filed by the decree holder (DHr) on the ground that despite sufficient opportunities, no effective steps were taken toward executing the decree against the judgment debtor (JDr). The court noted that the petition, filed on 19-06-2025, had not progressed, and the DHr's counsel was absent without representation, providing no reasonable grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
07-Feb-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
24-Jan-2026
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
08-Jan-2026
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
13-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
25-Oct-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
13-Sep-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
13-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi
-
30-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 140/2025
The JMFC Jewargi court dismissed the execution petition filed by the decree holder (DHr) on the ground that despite sufficient opportunities, no effective steps were taken toward executing the decree against the judgment debtor (JDr). The court noted that the petition, filed on 19-06-2025, had not progressed, and the DHr's counsel was absent without representation, providing no reasonable grounds for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts