MOHAMMED MINAJUDDIN S/o RAFEEQ BAGWAN vs The Birth and Death Registrar the TMC Jewargi — 275/2026

Case under Bdr Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB610005372026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

275/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI

Judge

829-Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

JEVARGI PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bdr Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED MINAJUDDIN S/o RAFEEQ BAGWAN

    Adv. Maiboob Patel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Birth and Death Registrar the TMC Jewargi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 275/2026 Summary: The Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Minajuddin's petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act to register his date of birth as 11-06-2012 in Jewargi Village, Kalaburagi District. The case was compromised after both parties mutually agreed, with the Birth and Death Registrar consenting to make the necessary entry in the register upon collection of requisite fee and penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge, Jevargi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 275/2026 Summary: The Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Minajuddin's petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act to register his date of birth as 11-06-2012 in Jewargi Village, Kalaburagi District. The case was compromised after both parties mutually agreed, with the Birth and Death Registrar consenting to make the necessary entry in the register upon collection of requisite fee and penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case