Sharanamma W/o Hanamanth Gadivaddar Age 35Yrs Occ Household R/o Kattisangavi Tq Jewargi Dist Kalabu vs Hanamanth S/o Bheemanna aliyas Bheemasya Gadivaddar Age 40Yrs Occ Goundi R/o Gobbur Tq Gangavati — 116/2019
Case under Sec10 of Cpc Section U/Sec.128. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 02nd April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB610004452019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
116/2019
Filing Date
16-07-2019
Registration No
116/2019
Registration Date
16-07-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharanamma W/o Hanamanth Gadivaddar Age 35Yrs Occ Household R/o Kattisangavi Tq Jewargi Dist Kalabu
Adv. G Balbatti
Umashree D/o Hanamanth Gadivaddar Age 12Yrs Occ Student U/g their natural mother P No.1 R/o Kattisa
Rohit S/o Hanamanth Gadivaddar Age 4yrs Occ Student minor U/g their natural mother Petitioner No.1
Respondent(s)
Hanamanth S/o Bheemanna aliyas Bheemasya Gadivaddar Age 40Yrs Occ Goundi R/o Gobbur Tq Gangavati
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Disposed
NOTICE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 20-02-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 29-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 12-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 116/2019 because the petitioner and counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date despite being granted sufficient time and opportunities to take necessary steps. The court found no grounds to adjourn the case further given the petitioner's inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 116/2019 because the petitioner and counsel failed to appear on the scheduled date despite being granted sufficient time and opportunities to take necessary steps. The court found no grounds to adjourn the case further given the petitioner's inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts