State Through Jewargi Police Station vs Kailash S/o Shivaram Rathod Age 21 Yrs Occ Student R/o Harwal Tq Jewargi Dist Kalaburagi — 143/2018
Case under Sec10 of Cpc Section U/Sec.417,419. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB610004022018
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
143/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
143/2018
Registration Date
25-09-2018
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
JEVARGI PS
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Jewargi Police Station
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Kailash S/o Shivaram Rathod Age 21 Yrs Occ Student R/o Harwal Tq Jewargi Dist Kalaburagi
Shivaram S/o Thavaru Rathod Age 48Yrs Occ Agri R/o Harwal Tq Jewargi Dist Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 30-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 05-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 17-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The Karnataka High Court, in FIR Section 143/2019, posed two questions to the accused (a 20-year-old male) regarding charges under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act related to an incident on 15-12-2018: (1) whether he admits to the offense and (2) whether he pleads guilty or not guilty. The court order, dated 20-07-2019, appears to be directing the accused to respond to these framing of charges rather than delivering a final verdict on bail or conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Karnataka High Court, in FIR Section 143/2019, posed two questions to the accused (a 20-year-old male) regarding charges under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act related to an incident on 15-12-2018: (1) whether he admits to the offense and (2) whether he pleads guilty or not guilty. The court order, dated 20-07-2019, appears to be directing the accused to respond to these framing of charges rather than delivering a final verdict on bail or conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts