Abrahimsab S/o Dastagirsab Tamboli Age 45Yrs R/o Itaga Tq Jewargi now R/o Ganagapur Tq Afzalpur vs The Deputy Commissioner At Kalaburagi — 14/2019
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/Sec.18. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KAKB610003762019
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
14/2019
Filing Date
19-06-2019
Registration No
14/2019
Registration Date
02-07-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abrahimsab S/o Dastagirsab Tamboli Age 45Yrs R/o Itaga Tq Jewargi now R/o Ganagapur Tq Afzalpur
Adv. B M Malkapure
Respondent(s)
The Deputy Commissioner At Kalaburagi
The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAC No. 14/2019 The court allowed claimant Abrahimsab's application (IA No. 4) to implead the Executive Engineer of KBJNL and another as additional respondents (Respondents 3 & 4) in this land acquisition dispute dated March 25, 2023. The court found these beneficiaries of the acquisition to be necessary and proper parties, citing Supreme Court precedent that beneficiaries have the right to be heard and defend acquisition awards. The claimant contested the acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 without proper inspection and without providing interest as per the Land Acquisition Act. The case was adjourned to April 3, 2023 for the claimant to file an amended petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LAC No. 14/2019 The court allowed claimant Abrahimsab's application (IA No. 4) to implead the Executive Engineer of KBJNL and another as additional respondents (Respondents 3 & 4) in this land acquisition dispute dated March 25, 2023. The court found these beneficiaries of the acquisition to be necessary and proper parties, citing Supreme Court precedent that beneficiaries have the right to be heard and defend acquisition awards. The claimant contested the acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 without proper inspection and without providing interest as per the Land Acquisition Act. The case was adjourned to April 3, 2023 for the claimant to file an amended petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts