Basawantraya S/o Gurulingappa Since deceased by LRs vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP Now at Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur Dist Yadgir — 64/2025
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/o,21,Rule,11,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAKB610001272025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
64/2025
Filing Date
29-01-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JEVARGI
Judge
829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Basawantraya S/o Gurulingappa Since deceased by LRs
Adv. Prabhugouda M Patil
Sahebagouda S/o late Baswantraya Age 57yrs R/o Village Biriyal (B) Tq Jewargi Dist KLB
Chandrashekhar S/o Late Basavantraya Age 53yrs R/o Village Biriyal (B) Tq Jewargi Dist KLB
Guralingappa S/o Late Baswantraya Age 50yrs R/o Village Biriyal (B) Tq Jewargi Dist KLB
Respondent(s)
The Special Land Acquisition Officer UKP Now at Bhimarayangudi Tq Shahapur Dist Yadgir
The Deputy Commissioner Mini Vidhan Soudha KLB
Hearing History
Judge: 829-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JEVARGI
Disposed
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
NOTICE
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 12-02-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 24-01-2026 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sr.CJ & JMFC, Jewargi dismissed the execution petition (Ex 64/2025) filed on 29-01-2025 for lack of diligence. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities, the Decree Holder's counsel failed to take any effective steps for execution of the decree and was repeatedly absent, providing no reasonable grounds for adjournment, thereby violating Supreme Court guidelines requiring disposal within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sr.CJ & JMFC, Jewargi dismissed the execution petition (Ex 64/2025) filed on 29-01-2025 for lack of diligence. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities, the Decree Holder's counsel failed to take any effective steps for execution of the decree and was repeatedly absent, providing no reasonable grounds for adjournment, thereby violating Supreme Court guidelines requiring disposal within 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts