State through Kalagi P S vs SHER ALI ALIAS MAHMED ALI S/O MAHMED RASHIDage 31 yrs, R/at Kalagi. — 1057/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB520050092025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
1059/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
1057/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0002
Police Station
KALGI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Kalagi P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHER ALI ALIAS MAHMED ALI S/O MAHMED RASHIDage 31 yrs, R/at Kalagi.
KAILASH S/O NAGAPPA MALAGI, age 28 yrs, R/at Garampalli Tq Chincholi.
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC-1057/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Sher Ali and Kailash of charges under Sections 331(4) (nighttime house-breaking) and 305 (theft) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: While a temple hundi theft occurred in January 2025, the prosecution failed to prove the defendants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Though CCTV showed masked men stealing the hundi, faces were unclear. Crucially, the complainant and temple trust members testified the accused weren't shown to them and didn't commit the offense. The accused's police confessions and recovered Rs. 15,000 were inadmissible as evidence under law, lacking proper procedural compliance (Section 23 of BSA 2023). Without corroborating witness testimony or properly documented recovery procedures, the prosecution's case collapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC-1057/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Sher Ali and Kailash of charges under Sections 331(4) (nighttime house-breaking) and 305 (theft) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: While a temple hundi theft occurred in January 2025, the prosecution failed to prove the defendants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Though CCTV showed masked men stealing the hundi, faces were unclear. Crucially, the complainant and temple trust members testified the accused weren't shown to them and didn't commit the offense. The accused's police confessions and recovered Rs. 15,000 were inadmissible as evidence under law, lacking proper procedural compliance (Section 23 of BSA 2023). Without corroborating witness testimony or properly documented recovery procedures, the prosecution's case collapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts