State through Kalagi P S vs SHER ALI ALIAS MAHMED ALI S/O MAHMED RASHIDage 31 yrs, R/at Kalagi. — 1057/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB520050092025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

1059/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

1057/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0002

Police Station

KALGI PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Kalagi P S

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHER ALI ALIAS MAHMED ALI S/O MAHMED RASHIDage 31 yrs, R/at Kalagi.

  2. 2.KAILASH S/O NAGAPPA MALAGI, age 28 yrs, R/at Garampalli Tq Chincholi.

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC-1057/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Sher Ali and Kailash of charges under Sections 331(4) (nighttime house-breaking) and 305 (theft) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: While a temple hundi theft occurred in January 2025, the prosecution failed to prove the defendants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Though CCTV showed masked men stealing the hundi, faces were unclear. Crucially, the complainant and temple trust members testified the accused weren't shown to them and didn't commit the offense. The accused's police confessions and recovered Rs. 15,000 were inadmissible as evidence under law, lacking proper procedural compliance (Section 23 of BSA 2023). Without corroborating witness testimony or properly documented recovery procedures, the prosecution's case collapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  13. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  14. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  16. 25-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  17. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  18. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  19. 19-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  20. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  21. 02-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  22. 24-Jan-2026

    ChargeView PDF

  23. 24-Jan-2026

    Evidence-Criminal

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  24. 14-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  25. 03-Jan-2026

    Bail

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  26. 26-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1057/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC-1057/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Sher Ali and Kailash of charges under Sections 331(4) (nighttime house-breaking) and 305 (theft) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Key Reasoning: While a temple hundi theft occurred in January 2025, the prosecution failed to prove the defendants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Though CCTV showed masked men stealing the hundi, faces were unclear. Crucially, the complainant and temple trust members testified the accused weren't shown to them and didn't commit the offense. The accused's police confessions and recovered Rs. 15,000 were inadmissible as evidence under law, lacking proper procedural compliance (Section 23 of BSA 2023). Without corroborating witness testimony or properly documented recovery procedures, the prosecution's case collapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case