Hema W/o Vishwanath Reddy D/o Late Vshwanath Raddy Age 42 years Occ PDO vs The Birth and Death Registrar TMC Office Chittapr — 3748/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520049372025

ORDERS

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-12-2025

Filing Number

3749/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

3748/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

Hema W/o Vishwanath Reddy D/o Late Vshwanath Raddy Age 42 years Occ PDO

Adv. Ayyappa M

Rooadevi Malipatil W/o Basavaraj Reddy (D/o Vishwanat Raddy) Age 44 Years Occ Household

Adv. Ayyappa M

Nagaraj S/o Late Vishwnt Reddy Age 40 Years Occ Household

Adv. Ayyappa M

Respondent(s)

The Birth and Death Registrar TMC Office Chittapr

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

30-04-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

ENQUIRY PARTIES

05-03-2026

ENQUIRY PARTIES

13-02-2026

ENQUIRY PARTIES

16-12-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Interim Orders

30-04-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: Crl.Misc. 3748/2025 On 30.04.2026, the court heard the petition filed by Hema, Rooadevi Malipatil, and Nagaraj against the Birth and Death Registrar, TMC Office, Chittapur. The petitioner's affidavit evidence was recorded and five supporting documents (application copy, affidavit, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices) were admitted as exhibits. The respondent was unopposed, no cross-examination occurred, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc. 3748/2025 On 30.04.2026, the court heard the petition filed by Hema, Rooadevi Malipatil, and Nagaraj against the Birth and Death Registrar, TMC Office, Chittapur. The petitioner's affidavit evidence was recorded and five supporting documents (application copy, affidavit, genealogy certificate, Aadhaar card, and newspaper notices) were admitted as exhibits. The respondent was unopposed, no cross-examination occurred, and no further hearing was scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case