Chandramma W/o Late Mastan Mulimani Age 71 yrs Occ Coolie vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Kalagi — 3565/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Orders Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520047522025

e-Filing Number

17-11-2025

Filing Number

3565/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

3565/2025

Registration Date

06-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandramma W/o Late Mastan Mulimani Age 71 yrs Occ Coolie

    Adv. manjula shivanand saradgi

  2. 2.Tippanna S/o Late Mastan Mulimani Age 33 yrs Occ Coolie

    Adv. manjula shivanand saradgi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasildar Kalagi

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In Crl.Misc. 3565/2025, the court heard the petitioner's affidavit on 29-01-2026 and admitted various documentary evidence including copies of applications, affidavits, genealogy certificates, and Aadhaar card. The court noted that the respondent is a unilateral party with no party objections, and no cross-examination was conducted. The matter was marked as heard with no further rejoinder required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3565/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Crl.Misc. 3565/2025, the court heard the petitioner's affidavit on 29-01-2026 and admitted various documentary evidence including copies of applications, affidavits, genealogy certificates, and Aadhaar card. The court noted that the respondent is a unilateral party with no party objections, and no cross-examination was conducted. The matter was marked as heard with no further rejoinder required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case