Siddharam S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie vs The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur — 3564/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520047512025
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
3564/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
3564/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddharam S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie
Adv. Bramalambika Salimath
-
2.Shivaraj S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 60 yrs Oc Coolie
-
3.Prakash S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 58 yrs Occ Coolie
-
4.Sharada D/o Ramachdra Bhairi W/o Panduranga Age 61 yrs Occ Coolie
-
5.Laxmibai W/o Ramachandra Bhairi W/o Basanna Age 63 yrs Occ Coolie
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 3564/2025, the court examined the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents including proof of relationship, Aadhar card, and newspaper notices on the date of hearing (29-01-2026). The court admitted the affidavit as the main evidence, marked various documents as exhibits (NIPO 1-6), and found no cross-examination necessary as the opposing party appeared ex-parte. The petition proceeded without further hearing and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC, Chittapur
-
15-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3564/2025
In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 3564/2025, the court examined the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents including proof of relationship, Aadhar card, and newspaper notices on the date of hearing (29-01-2026). The court admitted the affidavit as the main evidence, marked various documents as exhibits (NIPO 1-6), and found no cross-examination necessary as the opposing party appeared ex-parte. The petition proceeded without further hearing and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts