Siddharam S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie vs The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur — 3564/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520047512025
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
3564/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
3564/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddharam S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 65 yrs Occ Coolie
Adv. Bramalambika Salimath
Shivaraj S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 60 yrs Oc Coolie
Prakash S/o Ramachandra Bhairi Age 58 yrs Occ Coolie
Sharada D/o Ramachdra Bhairi W/o Panduranga Age 61 yrs Occ Coolie
Laxmibai W/o Ramachandra Bhairi W/o Basanna Age 63 yrs Occ Coolie
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 29-01-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 15-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
Interim Orders
In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 3564/2025, the court examined the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents including proof of relationship, Aadhar card, and newspaper notices on the date of hearing (29-01-2026). The court admitted the affidavit as the main evidence, marked various documents as exhibits (NIPO 1-6), and found no cross-examination necessary as the opposing party appeared ex-parte. The petition proceeded without further hearing and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 3564/2025, the court examined the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents including proof of relationship, Aadhar card, and newspaper notices on the date of hearing (29-01-2026). The court admitted the affidavit as the main evidence, marked various documents as exhibits (NIPO 1-6), and found no cross-examination necessary as the opposing party appeared ex-parte. The petition proceeded without further hearing and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts