Khyadigappa S/o Shivappa Age 49 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Allolli Vilage vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil office Chittapur — 3349/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520045352025
e-Filing Number
01-09-2025
Filing Number
3349/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
3349/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khyadigappa S/o Shivappa Age 49 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Allolli Vilage
Adv. B.B.Doddamani
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil office Chittapur
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 29-01-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 10-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Civil Judge at Chittapur granted the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, allowing late registration of his mother's death (Rayamma W/o Shivappa) who died on 06.01.2024. The court directed the Registrar to enter the death record upon payment of the requisite penalty, finding the petitioner's claim credible based on documentary evidence, newspaper publications, and the absence of any opposing evidence from the respondent or family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Civil Judge at Chittapur granted the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, allowing late registration of his mother's death (Rayamma W/o Shivappa) who died on 06.01.2024. The court directed the Registrar to enter the death record upon payment of the requisite penalty, finding the petitioner's claim credible based on documentary evidence, newspaper publications, and the absence of any opposing evidence from the respondent or family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts