Nagappa S/o Narasappa Age 37 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Diggaon Village vs The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur — 3340/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB520045262025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3340/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

3340/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR

Judge

326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13,

Petitioner(s)

Nagappa S/o Narasappa Age 37 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Diggaon Village

Adv. B.B.Doddamani

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Birth and Death Tahasil Office Chittapur

Hearing History

Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur

04-04-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

20-02-2026

ORDERS

29-01-2026

ORDERS

10-12-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Orders

Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Chittapur allowed Nagappa's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the death of his brother Dyavappa (dated 10.01.2010) upon payment of requisite penalty. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible, supported by documentary evidence including a non-availability certificate and newspaper publications, and noted that no opposing party contested the claim despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Chittapur allowed Nagappa's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the death of his brother Dyavappa (dated 10.01.2010) upon payment of requisite penalty. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible, supported by documentary evidence including a non-availability certificate and newspaper publications, and noted that no opposing party contested the claim despite public notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case