Bhimaraya So Sharanappa Age 64 Years Occ Agriculture Ro Bhar Peth Chittapur Tq Chittapur vs The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur — 3226/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB520044122025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
3226/2025
Filing Date
01-12-2025
Registration No
3226/2025
Registration Date
01-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITAPUR
Judge
326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhimaraya So Sharanappa Age 64 Years Occ Agriculture Ro Bhar Peth Chittapur Tq Chittapur
Adv. Mallikarjun Shankreppa
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Birth and Death TMC Office Chittapur Tq Chittapur
Hearing History
Judge: 326-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
ORDERS
ENQUIRY PARTIES
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 20-02-2026 | ENQUIRY PARTIES |
| 12-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Misc. 3226/2025 Petitioner Bhimaraya So Sharanappa filed a miscellaneous petition against the Registrar of Birth and Death, TMC Office Chittapur. On 13.03.2026, the petitioner's affidavit was recorded and the court admitted various documentary evidence including copies of the application to respondent's office, affidavit, genealogical certificate, Aadhaar card, and published notices. No cross-examination was required as the respondent appeared unopposed, and the case proceeded for final judgment with fingerprints recorded in court records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc. 3226/2025 Petitioner Bhimaraya So Sharanappa filed a miscellaneous petition against the Registrar of Birth and Death, TMC Office Chittapur. On 13.03.2026, the petitioner's affidavit was recorded and the court admitted various documentary evidence including copies of the application to respondent's office, affidavit, genealogical certificate, Aadhaar card, and published notices. No cross-examination was required as the respondent appeared unopposed, and the case proceeded for final judgment with fingerprints recorded in court records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts